From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Thu Aug 1 16:20:42 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Gary Moncur) Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 08:20:42 -0700 Subject: [303rd-Talk] Whole Nine Yards Message-ID: <3D48EF5A.2210.AB1EC3@localhost> Hi All, While watching a short PBS video on the B-17 Sentimental Journey's visit to Salisbury, Maryland, one of the men interviewed used the term "the whole nine yards" and said it originated from WWII. According to him, a full load of ammunition for gunners was a belt 27 feet, or 9 yards, long. Searching the internet for the origin of that phrase offers several possibilities, one being the ammo belts. Do any of you remember the term "the whole nine yards" from WWII days? Is the ammo belt theory correct? Thanks! -- Gary -- Webmaster, 303rd Bomb Group (H) Association http://www.303rdBGA.com http://www.B17Thunderbird.com From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Thu Aug 1 17:12:52 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Fory Barton) Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 11:12:52 -0500 Subject: [303rd-Talk] 9 yards Message-ID: <001a01c23976$52d7e540$23bcf5cd@computer> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0017_01C2394C.60B57E40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The way I heard it, the phrase referred to the length of ammo belts for = fighter pilots Fory ------=_NextPart_000_0017_01C2394C.60B57E40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The way I heard it, the phrase referred = to the=20 length of ammo belts for fighter pilots
 
Fory
------=_NextPart_000_0017_01C2394C.60B57E40-- From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Thu Aug 1 23:12:49 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Gary Moncur) Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 15:12:49 -0700 Subject: [303rd-Talk] Gordy Alton Message-ID: <3D494FF1.16040.224793F@localhost> Friends, Gordy Alton, my friend and co-administrator for this list, had his only brother pass away this morning. He is off to be with family for the next week or two and is not getting mail from this list. I'm sure he would appreciate any offers of condolences from his list friends. If you'd like, please send him a personal note to Gordy@303rdBGA.com Thanks, -- Gary -- Webmaster, 303rd Bomb Group (H) Association http://www.303rdBGA.com http://www.B17Thunderbird.com From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Sat Aug 3 13:28:39 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (VONDRA BURRELL) Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002 07:28:39 -0500 Subject: [303rd-Talk] Whole Nine Yards Message-ID: ------=_NextPart_001_0001_01C23ABF.6336DE60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I would add that not all fighters are created equal and it is not true fo= r all, but I too have read that it was in fact the leangth of ammo in a f= ighter. Therefore if you emptied your guns on a target you gave them the = "whole nine yards" Interesting how a phrase will take on new meanings ov= er the years. =20 PS. Did anyone happen to get to the Air Expo in Minneapolis or Oskosh thi= s year. I went to both Awsome to meet so many WWII vets in one place "A= ir Expo" at that show the airplanes were secondary to me. At Oskosh to s= ee 18 P-51s in the air at one time was a thrill beyond my dreams. I'm su= re that you 303rd men also liked seeing that many P-51s with you, but pro= bably saw that many and many more quite often by the end of the war. =20 Lance Burrell ----- Original Message ----- From: Gary Moncur Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 9:27 AM To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Subject: [303rd-Talk] Whole Nine Yards Hi All, While watching a short PBS video on the B-17 Sentimental =20 Journey's visit to Salisbury, Maryland, one of the men =20 interviewed used the term "the whole nine yards" and said it =20 originated from WWII. According to him, a full load of =20 ammunition for gunners was a belt 27 feet, or 9 yards, long. =20 Searching the internet for the origin of that phrase offers =20 several possibilities, one being the ammo belts. Do any of you =20 remember the term "the whole nine yards" from WWII days? Is the =20 ammo belt theory correct? Thanks! -- Gary -- Webmaster, 303rd Bomb Group (H) Association http://www.303rdBGA.com http://www.B17Thunderbird.com ------=_NextPart_001_0001_01C23ABF.6336DE60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I would add th= at not all fighters are created equal and it is not true for all, but I t= oo have read that it was in fact the leangth of ammo in a fighter. Theref= ore if you emptied your guns on a target you gave them the "whole nine ya= rds"  Interesting how a phrase will take on new meanings over the ye= ars.
  
PS. Did anyone happen to get to = the Air Expo in Minneapolis or Oskosh this year.   I went to bo= th Awsome to meet so many WWII vets in one place "Air Expo" at that show = the airplanes were secondary to me.  At Oskosh to see 18 P-51s in th= e air at one time was a thrill beyond my dreams.  I'm sure that you = 303rd men also liked seeing that many P-51s with you, but probably saw th= at many and many more quite often by the end of the war.
Lanc= e Burrell
 
----- Original Message = -----
From: Gary Moncur
S= ent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 9:27 AM
To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com
Subject: [303rd-Talk] Whole Nine Yards
 Hi All,
While watching a short PBS video on the B-17 Sentimental <= BR>Journey's visit to Salisbury, Maryland, one of the men
interviewed= used the term "the whole nine yards" and said it
originated from WWI= I.  According to him, a full load of
ammunition for gunners was = a belt 27 feet, or 9 yards, long. 
Searching the internet for th= e origin of that phrase offers
several possibilities, one being the a= mmo belts.  Do any of you
remember the term "the whole nine yard= s" from WWII days? Is the
ammo belt theory correct?

Thanks!-- Gary --  Webmaster, 303rd Bomb Group (H) Association
 &n= bsp;          http://www.303= rdBGA.com
          =   http://www.B17Thunderbird.com
------=_NextPart_001_0001_01C23ABF.6336DE60-- From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Mon Aug 5 14:08:48 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com) Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 09:08:48 EDT Subject: [303rd-Talk] Zwickau Raid Message-ID: Were any of you men on the Zwickau Oil Refinery Rain on March 19th, 1945? This may not have been a 303rd mission. I saw a painting in an aviation magazine of B-17s fighting off ME 262s. I could not see the BG number on the tail. Terry From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Mon Aug 5 15:57:43 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Gary Moncur) Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2002 07:57:43 -0700 Subject: [303rd-Talk] Zwickau Raid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <3D4E2FF7.26827.1C4DCE@localhost> > Were any of you men on the Zwickau Oil Refinery Rain on March > 19th, 1945? This may not have been a 303rd mission. I saw a > painting in an aviation magazine of B-17s fighting off ME 262s. > I could not see the BG number on the tail. Terry > > The 303rd flew a mission that day, but not to that target. An excerpt from our CD "The Molesworth Story" is below. I see that Bill's dad, Capt William E. Jones was flying a lead on this one and John Armfield was flying in the same formation. --------------------- 303rd BG (H) Combat Mission No. 340 19 March 1945 Target: Military Objectives at Plauen, Germany Crews Dispatched: 39 Length of Mission: 10 hours, 20 minutes Bomb Load: 10 x 600 lb G.P. bombs Bombing Altitudes 26,000, 24,300, & 26,410 ft Ammo Fired: 8,000 rounds Thirty-nine aircraft were dispatched to bomb: First Behlen, Germany =97 synthetic oil plant (visual) Second Plauen, Germany =97 machine works (visual) Third Plauen, Germany =97 military objectives (H2X) Fourth Suhl, Germany =97 small arms factory The lead and high Squadrons attacked the third priority target when the low Squadron's PFF equipment failed and they bombed off the lead. Results were generally unobserved, with a few reports of bombs hitting in the target area and some in fields outside of town. ----------------- -- Gary -- Webmaster, 303rd Bomb Group (H) Association http://www.303rdBGA.com http://www.B17Thunderbird.com From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Mon Aug 5 17:45:45 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com) Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 12:45:45 EDT Subject: [303rd-Talk] RE: The Whole Nine Yards Message-ID: --part1_de.2b1c5397.2a8005b9_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit For an interesting article about the origin of the phrase "The Whole Nine Yards" see: http://www.quinion.com/words/articles/nineyards.htm Harry D. Gobrecht --part1_de.2b1c5397.2a8005b9_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit For an interesting article about the origin of the phrase "The Whole Nine Yards" see:
      
http://www.quinion.com/words/articles/nineyards.htm

Harry D. Gobrecht
--part1_de.2b1c5397.2a8005b9_boundary-- From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Mon Aug 5 17:41:37 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Bill Jones) Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 12:41:37 -0400 Subject: [303rd-Talk] Zwickau Raid In-Reply-To: <3D4E2FF7.26827.1C4DCE@localhost> References: Message-ID: <3D4E7281.2094.11C34C9@localhost> > > Were any of you men on the Zwickau Oil Refinery Rain on March > > 19th, 1945? This may not have been a 303rd mission. I saw a > > painting in an aviation magazine of B-17s fighting off ME 262s. I > > could not see the BG number on the tail. Terry > > The 303rd flew a mission that day, but not to that target. I have a little additional info on that mission that I collected at http://wejones.ftdata.com/mar19.html Included among the info there is an interesting account written by the division leader (a Captain Watson from another bomb group), and a couple maps of where the mission was supposed to go, and how they got to the tertiary target by making a 180 deg turn shortly after the original IP. It's pretty interesting. The account of Capt Watson makes it sound like the mission was almost a disaster with near mid- air collissions in the vicinity of the 180deg turn, however the 303rdbg reports make it sound like a routine mission. There is also a report that Jim Walling (who was also on this mission) sent me, and some documents that I collected at the National Archives on this page also. Apparently some of the other groups bombed the primary target. Anyway, it was interesting to read about how the switch to a secondary target was accomplished. Bill Jones N3JLQ Sweden Maine wejones@megalink.net Main home page http://www.megalink.net/~wejones WWII/B-17 page http://www.megalink.net/~wejones/wwii.html From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Wed Aug 7 17:24:36 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Pierce, Gregory S) Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 09:24:36 -0700 Subject: [303rd-Talk] RE: Anklam mission, 9-Oct-1943 Message-ID: Do I have any veterans of this mission who would like to share their memories. I know that Anklam was the subassembly plant for FW-190's and that the bombing altitude was low something like 13,000 ft. Was flak light or heavy on the bomb run? Fighters? What was dropped i.e. 500 lb GP Bomb's? What was the post strike assessment? Who lead? Cloud cover over the target? Where did you encounter flak? Here is your ration of whiskey! Thank you, Greg Pierce E-mail gregory.s.pierce@boeing.com From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Wed Aug 7 18:42:52 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Gary Moncur) Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 10:42:52 -0700 Subject: [303rd-Talk] RE: Anklam mission, 9-Oct-1943 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <3D50F9AC.19096.CF6194@localhost> > Do I have any veterans of this mission who would like to share > their memories. I know that Anklam was the subassembly plant for > FW-190's and that the bombing altitude was low something like > 13,000 ft. > That mission is the one re-enacted in the video "Target for Today." I see that the Bill Heller Crew aborted with engine problems on that one. I didn't spot any else I know while quickly glancing through the loading lists, but I could have missed someone. >From the CD "The Molesworth Story": "The conditions at the target were perfect for an attack. There was no flak and no fighters were encountered in the target area. The weather was superb with no clouds and unlimited visibility. Bomb results were clearly visible and results were excellent. The lead bombardier, 1Lt. Byron K. Butt reported, "A damn well-planned, well-executed mission by all concerned." The 303rd BG(H) dropped 27 tons of 1,000-lb. bombs and incendiaries. After bombing and leaving the target, the first flak was encountered at Rostock. It was intense and accurate. >From the target to Rostock, enemy fighter attacks were spasmodic. They then became persistent until about 100 miles from the Keil Peninsula. Gen. Travis reported 169 ME-110s and FW-190s, and some ME-210s and JU-88s in this area. The P-47 fighters that were supposed to meet the bombers failed to make their rendezvous." -- Gary -- Webmaster, 303rd Bomb Group (H) Association http://www.303rdBGA.com http://www.B17Thunderbird.com From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Wed Aug 7 18:07:47 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (William Heller) Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 10:07:47 -0700 Subject: [303rd-Talk] RE: Anklam mission, 9-Oct-1943 References: <3D50F9AC.19096.CF6194@localhost> Message-ID: <3D5153E2.FD42AB9B@attglobal.net> GM ... Anent your mention of the Bill Heller crew aborting on the Anklam mission you mentioned, yes, that was correct. I recall (so long ago) that we were on the East end of the Danish peninsula when we aborted. One engine out completely. I believe it was #2. In any event we hit the deck and came back across the North Sea back to base. We had one or two sporadic attacks by FW190s as we left the Danish peninsula outbound on the way home. Cheers! WCH Gary Moncur wrote: > > Do I have any veterans of this mission who would like to share > > their memories. I know that Anklam was the subassembly plant for > > FW-190's and that the bombing altitude was low something like > > 13,000 ft. > > > > That mission is the one re-enacted in the video "Target for > Today." I see that the Bill Heller Crew aborted with engine > problems on that one. I didn't spot any else I know while > quickly glancing through the loading lists, but I could have > missed someone. > > >From the CD "The Molesworth Story": > "The conditions at the target were perfect for an attack. There > was no flak and no fighters were encountered in the target > area. The weather was superb with no clouds and unlimited > visibility. Bomb results were clearly visible and results were > excellent. The lead bombardier, 1Lt. Byron K. Butt reported, "A > damn well-planned, well-executed mission by all concerned." The > 303rd BG(H) dropped 27 tons of 1,000-lb. bombs and > incendiaries. After bombing and leaving the target, the first > flak was encountered at Rostock. It was intense and accurate. > >From the target to Rostock, enemy fighter attacks were > spasmodic. They then became persistent until about 100 miles > from the Keil Peninsula. Gen. Travis reported 169 ME-110s and > FW-190s, and some ME-210s and JU-88s in this area. The P-47 > fighters that were supposed to meet the bombers failed to make > their rendezvous." > > -- Gary -- Webmaster, 303rd Bomb Group (H) Association > http://www.303rdBGA.com > http://www.B17Thunderbird.com From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Fri Aug 9 19:15:44 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Maurice Paulk) Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 13:15:44 -0500 Subject: [303rd-Talk] B-17 Ball Turret Message-ID: <000901c23fd0$ca1338c0$19bb9ace@mjpmtman> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C23FA6.DE530920 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0006_01C23FA6.DE530920" ------=_NextPart_001_0006_01C23FA6.DE530920 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable After relating a story, Rumor? I heard while at Molesworth [ball turret = gunner's door door came open and his flight boot catching in the range = stirrup saved him], My listener said that he couldn't have fallen out = because the door was not in the right place. Although it states the "G" had the ball turret in it --- we know better = --The "F" did too. This site proves me right BUT it raises another question ---When was the = first design outdated OR was the second design only used in combat.???? = Any body care to tackle that one --- Maurice J. Paulk http://www.softwhale.com/history/b-17/ball-turret.html ------=_NextPart_001_0006_01C23FA6.DE530920 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
After relating a story, Rumor? I heard = while at=20 Molesworth  [ball turret gunner's door door came open and his = flight boot=20 catching in the range stirrup saved him], My listener said that he = couldn't have=20 fallen out because the door was not in the right place.
Although it states the "G" had the ball = turret in=20 it --- we know better --The "F" did too.
 
This site proves me right BUT it raises = another=20 question ---When was the first design outdated  OR was the second = design=20 only used in combat.???? Any body care to tackle that one --- Maurice J. = Paulk
 

 http://ww= w.softwhale.com/history/b-17/ball-turret.html
------=_NextPart_001_0006_01C23FA6.DE530920-- ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C23FA6.DE530920 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="B-17 Ball Turret.url" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="B-17 Ball Turret.url" [DEFAULT] BASEURL=http://www.softwhale.com/history/b-17/ball-turret.html [InternetShortcut] URL=http://www.softwhale.com/history/b-17/ball-turret.html Modified=608F524ACF3FC2015C ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C23FA6.DE530920-- From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Sat Aug 10 04:14:39 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Leroy Audrey) Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 22:14:39 -0500 Subject: [303rd-Talk] B-17 Ball Turret References: <000901c23fd0$ca1338c0$19bb9ace@mjpmtman> Message-ID: <001001c2401c$1078a840$8bab7618@ce1.client2.attbi.com> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C23FF2.27565500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Check Roger Freeman's WARMANUEL, Part 2 Armament "Major Reed, Engrg Officer, of Bovingdon DDRC in Jan '43 made a report = of many problems with the B-17E. This included ball turret problems = (fractur9ng doors, ammo jamming, oxygen supply) A B-17E was flown back = to the Wright, modifcations were made and the plane retrnd to 8th in = October '43. It seems changes were then made plane by plane in the UK = and on the production line into the B-17-F and into B-17G. There is alot = of reading there. I do know that during training at Sioux City IA, the door did fall off = the ball turret during a gunnery training fleet of the plane the crew I = joined was training. This happened the day before I joined the crew and = that first day of my assignment was just sitting around while the crew = had an investigative hearing in the Squadron commander.s office. LeRoy Christenson =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Maurice Paulk=20 To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com ; Jim Wall=20 Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 1:15 PM Subject: [303rd-Talk] B-17 Ball Turret After relating a story, Rumor? I heard while at Molesworth [ball = turret gunner's door door came open and his flight boot catching in the = range stirrup saved him], My listener said that he couldn't have fallen = out because the door was not in the right place. Although it states the "G" had the ball turret in it --- we know = better --The "F" did too. This site proves me right BUT it raises another question ---When was = the first design outdated OR was the second design only used in = combat.???? Any body care to tackle that one --- Maurice J. Paulk http://www.softwhale.com/history/b-17/ball-turret.html ------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C23FF2.27565500 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Check Roger Freeman's  WARMANUEL, = Part 2=20 Armament
"Major Reed, Engrg Officer, of = Bovingdon DDRC in=20 Jan '43 made a report of many problems with the B-17E. This included = ball turret=20 problems (fractur9ng doors, ammo jamming, oxygen supply)  A B-17E = was flown=20 back to the Wright, modifcations were made and the plane retrnd to=20 8th  in October '43. It seems changes were then made plane by = plane in=20 the UK and on the production line into the B-17-F and into B-17G. There = is alot=20 of reading there.
I do know that during training at Sioux = City IA,=20 the door did fall off the ball turret during a gunnery training fleet of = the=20 plane the crew I joined was training. This happened the day before I = joined the=20 crew and that first day of my assignment was just sitting around while = the crew=20 had an investigative hearing in the Squadron commander.s = office.
LeRoy = Christenson  
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Maurice = Paulk=20
To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com ; = Jim = Wall=20
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 = 1:15=20 PM
Subject: [303rd-Talk] B-17 Ball = Turret

After relating a story, Rumor? I = heard while at=20 Molesworth  [ball turret gunner's door door came open and his = flight boot=20 catching in the range stirrup saved him], My listener said that he = couldn't=20 have fallen out because the door was not in the right = place.
Although it states the "G" had the = ball turret in=20 it --- we know better --The "F" did too.
 
This site proves me right BUT it = raises another=20 question ---When was the first design outdated  OR was the second = design=20 only used in combat.???? Any body care to tackle that one --- Maurice = J.=20 Paulk
 

 http://ww= w.softwhale.com/history/b-17/ball-turret.html
------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C23FF2.27565500-- From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Sat Aug 10 03:36:47 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com) Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 21:36:47 -0500 Subject: [303rd-Talk] B-17 Ball Turret In-Reply-To: <001001c2401c$1078a840$8bab7618@ce1.client2.attbi.com> References: <000901c23fd0$ca1338c0$19bb9ace@mjpmtman> Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.20020809213647.0081c2b0@ilhawaii.net> Maurice, Ther was a safety belt across the door that I always made sure was in place when I was in the turret. I had a door come unlatched and blow away while I was in Phase training in Texas, before going overseas. I don't think I would have fallen out even if the belt was unfastened, but I guess it would have been possible. If the guns were not horizontal part of the door opening would have been inside the aircraft. I didn't know there were two designs. Jim Walling >>>> <<<<<<<< >>>> To: <303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com ; <Jim Wall Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 1:15 PM Subject: [303rd-Talk] B-17 Ball Turret After relating a story, Rumor? I heard while at Molesworth [ball turret gunner's door door came open and his flight boot catching in the range stirrup saved him], My listener said that he couldn't have fallen out because the door was not in the right place. Although it states the "G" had the ball turret in it --- we know better --The "F" did too. This site proves me right BUT it raises another question ---When was the first design outdated OR was the second design only used in combat.???? Any body care to tackle that one --- Maurice J. Paulk <http://www.softwhale.com/history/b-17/ball-turret.html <<<<<<<< From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Sat Aug 10 12:50:36 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (bill runnels) Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 04:50:36 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [303rd-Talk] B-17 Ball Turret In-Reply-To: <001001c2401c$1078a840$8bab7618@ce1.client2.attbi.com> Message-ID: <20020810115036.65688.qmail@web40207.mail.yahoo.com> During crew assembly training at Gulfport, Mississippi, the ball turret escape hatch fell off just north of Mobile, Alabama. The gunner was not harmed, only scared......Bill Runnels --- Leroy Audrey <royaudrey651@attbi.com> wrote: > Check Roger Freeman's WARMANUEL, Part 2 Armament > "Major Reed, Engrg Officer, of Bovingdon DDRC in Jan > '43 made a report of many problems with the B-17E. > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs http://www.hotjobs.com From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Sat Aug 10 18:12:59 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (ray.cossey1) Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 18:12:59 +0100 Subject: [303rd-Talk] Prone to flames Message-ID: <006801c24091$464be610$37e8fc3e@RAY> Hi Friends of the 303rd BG In the book "B-17 Flying Fortress", by H.P. Willmott, the author states " Though they were prone to flames the B-17s showed a remarkable ability top survive attacks that took out huge sections of wings, fuselage and tails. What did Mr Willmot mean by "they were prone to flames"? Does he mean that the B-17 was more combustible than other bombers? Also, from your experience, (be it air-crew or ground-crew), what was the greatest incident of damage you ever saw sustained by a B-17 and which, nevertheless, made it back to Molesworth? Come on Mr. President Rencher, Harry Gobrecht, Bill Heller and you many other knowledgeable folks, let's be hearing from you, please. Finally, I heard today from Marthe Curry, widow of the late Judge Peter Curry, who says she is so proud that the JAC at Molesworth has seen fit to award the "Peter Curry Award", to recognize outstanding support provided by an enlisted member to USEUCOM warfighters. Incidentally, Peter Curry became a great and dear friend of Theresa and mine and we had entertained him, and Marthe, on many occasions, at our home and especially, in recent years, at Christmas. Peter was an intelligence officer with the 303rd and I am interested to know if anyone remembers any little wartime anecdotes about his mission briefings. Incidentally, if you ever get to see the film "Sugarland Express" on the TV, starring Goldie Hawn, Peter Curry plays the part of the Texan judge, in the courtroom scene. The film was directed by Steven Spielberg, who, exasperated by Peter's insistence on courtroom accuracy, stormed doff the set and told Peter to "damn well direct the scene himself!". Peter did just that and got paid for it! Warmest best wishes from your pommie honorary member #03 Ray Cossey Norwich, England PS From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Sat Aug 10 20:09:19 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Maurice Paulk) Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 14:09:19 -0500 Subject: [303rd-Talk] Vol 1 #665 Message-ID: <001a01c240a1$90de5f40$53bb9ace@mjpmtman> Excerpt------------ Message: 2 From: "Leroy Audrey" Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 22:14:39 -0500 Check Roger Freeman's WARMANUEL, Part 2 Armament "..... A B-17E was flown back to the Wright, modifcations were made and the plane retrnd to 8th in October '43. It seems changes were then made plane by plane in the UK and on the production line into the B-17-F and into B-17G.. LeRoy Christenson . ================= I'll be durned!! don't recall seeing an "E" in England --- I arrived on 8 October 1942.. The leading edge of the vertical stab on the "E" was 90 degress to the fuselage - was it not? Maurice J. Paulk ---P.S I remembered Plain Text this time!!!!! From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Sun Aug 11 04:19:39 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Leroy Audrey) Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 22:19:39 -0500 Subject: [303rd-Talk] Vol 1 #665 References: <001a01c240a1$90de5f40$53bb9ace@mjpmtman> Message-ID: <000901c240e5$ef3c7380$8bab7618@ce1.client2.attbi.com> Maurice I read thusly--the "C" was defenseless according to the RAF. the "E" incorporated a host of changes--a widening of the tail sectio9n to include a gunners position, a larger vertial tail with long dorsal fin. Roger writes that 42 "E's" arrived in England with the 97th Bomb Group. The first landed at Prestwick 1 July 1942. The model "E" was already being superseded. The RAF wanted many modifications, the plane remained in combat about 2 weeks, then all planes were transferred to the 92nd BG, their "17-Fs" went to the 97th in return. and the 97th assumed an operational training role, finally these "Es" were replaced by "Fs" and each of the bomb groups received one of the "E" to use for training, ambulance service or whatever (the whatever is my interpetation of other service duty) LeRoy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Maurice Paulk" To: <303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com> Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 2:09 PM Subject: [303rd-Talk] Vol 1 #665 > Excerpt------------ > Message: 2 > From: "Leroy Audrey" > Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 22:14:39 -0500 > Check Roger Freeman's WARMANUEL, Part 2 Armament > "..... A B-17E was flown back to the Wright, modifcations were made > and the plane retrnd to 8th in October '43. It seems changes were then > made plane by plane in the UK and on the production line into the B-17-F > and into B-17G.. > LeRoy Christenson . > ================= > I'll be durned!! don't recall seeing an "E" in England --- I arrived on 8 > October 1942.. > The leading edge of the vertical stab on the "E" was 90 degress to the > fuselage - was it not? > Maurice J. Paulk ---P.S I remembered Plain Text this time!!!!! > > From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Mon Aug 12 00:29:48 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Leroy Audrey) Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 18:29:48 -0500 Subject: [303rd-Talk] Vol 1 #665 References: <001a01c240a1$90de5f40$53bb9ace@mjpmtman> <000901c240e5$ef3c7380$8bab7618@ce1.client2.attbi.com> Message-ID: <000701c2418e$fbe44dc0$8bab7618@ce1.client2.attbi.com> a correction to the message 97th should read 92nd became a training unit.---end of TRANSMISSION ----- Original Message ----- From: "Leroy Audrey" To: <303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com> Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 10:19 PM Subject: Re: [303rd-Talk] Vol 1 #665 > Maurice > I read thusly--the "C" was defenseless according to the > RAF. the "E" incorporated a host of changes--a widening of the tail sectio9n > to include a gunners position, a larger vertial tail with long dorsal fin. > Roger writes that 42 "E's" arrived in England with the 97th Bomb Group. The > first landed at Prestwick 1 July 1942. The model "E" was already being > superseded. The RAF wanted many modifications, the plane remained in combat > about 2 weeks, then all planes were transferred to the 92nd BG, their > "17-Fs" went to the 97th in return. and the 97th assumed an operational > training role, finally these "Es" were replaced by "Fs" and each of the bomb > groups received one of the "E" to use for training, ambulance service or > whatever (the whatever is my interpetation of other service duty) > LeRoy > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Maurice Paulk" > To: <303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com> > Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 2:09 PM > Subject: [303rd-Talk] Vol 1 #665 > > > > Excerpt------------ > > Message: 2 > > From: "Leroy Audrey" > > Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 22:14:39 -0500 > > Check Roger Freeman's WARMANUEL, Part 2 Armament > > "..... A B-17E was flown back to the Wright, modifcations were made > > and the plane retrnd to 8th in October '43. It seems changes were then > > made plane by plane in the UK and on the production line into the B-17-F > > and into B-17G.. > > LeRoy Christenson . > > ================= > > I'll be durned!! don't recall seeing an "E" in England --- I arrived on 8 > > October 1942.. > > The leading edge of the vertical stab on the "E" was 90 degress to the > > fuselage - was it not? > > Maurice J. Paulk ---P.S I remembered Plain Text this time!!!!! > > > > > > From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Mon Aug 12 04:44:40 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com) Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 23:44:40 EDT Subject: [303rd-Talk] Prone to flames Message-ID: <1bb.4a89499.2a888928@aol.com> Dear Friend Ray: Gasoline also know as petrol is no doubt highly flammable. As far as I know all our propeller driven bombers used the stuff for fuel. Oil is somewhat flammable but has a high flashpoint. Metal airplanes such as B17s and B24s are not very flammable without the above two items. I suppose a wooden aircraft such as a mosquito would burn a bit but I doubt if that would be a problem Personally I don't know where he got the idea that the B17 was subject to fires. I flew 35 missions in B17s. We had holes in the plane on 32 of these missions. sometimes just 2 or 5 or so and once over 300. One in the wing big enough one could throw a large lounge chair through it if one had a lounge chair and was quite strong. Many of the fragments and bullets that went through our plane no doubt went through the fuel tanks as they used up most of the wing area. Our self sealing tanks worked great and we never once had a fire it the fuel tank area. We did on two occasions have engine fires, but in both cases it was gasoline (petrol) that was burning and the fires blew out when we got the fuel shut off and the engines feathered. I don't want to start an other war here but I have seen B24s lose a wing and go down on fire which appeared to be in the main spar which I understand was used as a fuel tank. We have all seen pictures of damaged B17s to which I cannot add anything. but personally our greatest damage was our 300 plus hole damage from a mission to Merseburg. We got home back to Molesworth with 2 engines out no brakes, one flat tire, No throttle control on one of our two engines. and no elevator control except the trim tab. Note: We did not stay in formation on the way home. I put all our mixtures in Idle cut off, shut off all the switches on short final and landed dead stick. All 10 of us walked away with not one wounded crew member but I think our poor bird went to the scrap pile. I never saw it again while I was there. We did not know about our flat tire until we landed but it was a blessing. We had no brakes but the flat tire pulled us off the runway into a big circle on the grass and we came to a gentle stop. We were the last ones to land that day as we were a bit slow getting back to Molesworth. Now you know why I love B17s, Girls and Fried Chicken with biscuits and gravy. Best Wishes Ray and Wife, Jack Rencher From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Mon Aug 12 21:31:09 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Gary Moncur) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:31:09 -0700 Subject: [303rd-Talk] (Fwd) Robert Morgan's New Book Message-ID: <3D57B89D.18428.4FC82@localhost> ------- Forwarded message follows ------- Subject: Robert Morgan's New Book Date sent: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 08:19:49 -0800 From: "Kevin Pearson" To: Gary: Could you please post the following note, since I am having trouble sending from Yahoo? Robert Morgan has a new book out, titled, "The Man Who Flew the Memphis Belle." I saw this at Barnes and Noble a few weeks ago and scawfed at even more glory being awarded the Memphis Belle. I was again in Barnes and Noble last week, and decided to take a peek at the book. OK, OK, OK, the crew of the Belle have received a lot of the attention, and I sincerely appreciate that, but this book really is good. Morgan is very honest about his combat tour, his love affairs, and being selected to be the Eighth Air Force "poster boys." I found it to be a very good read and I was not expecting the level of honesty contained in the book. I do recommend this book if you'd like to find out the real story behind the Belle. So much of what I had heard and read was off the mark and in some cases downright wrong, like the Belle's last mission. Wylder's movie made it sound like Wilhelmhaven, when in fact, it was at Bremen. The intro to the book brought a tear to my eye it was that good. Paperback is $14 here in Alaska. Kevin M. Pearson Vice President, Business Development Anchorage Economic Development Corporation 900 W. 5th Ave., Suite 300 Anchorage, AK 99501 Phone: 800.462.7275 907.258.3700 Fax: 907.258.6646 e-mail: kpearson@aedcweb.com www.aedcweb.com ------- End of forwarded message --------- Gary -- Webmaster, 303rd Bomb Group (H) Association http://www.303rdBGA.com http://www.B17Thunderbird.com From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Mon Aug 12 20:38:23 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:38:23 EDT Subject: [303rd-Talk] last evening ,viewed memphis belle on dvd. Message-ID: <10d.1646b386.2a8968af@aol.com> it seemed inconsistent within the movie that there were too many scenes where oxgen masks were off for overly long periods, at the expected heigt of flight missions over berlin target, and guess just billy wilder's staff and us air corps advisors did not check such essential details of flights at high oxygen starved elevations. however, noted mostly that emergency tanks of oxygen was present mostly in the travels about aircraft.. others have any comments on this? another thought, have i read that wm. heller and/or gorbecht were flyers in filming of this movie? thamks. spec From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Mon Aug 12 21:08:08 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (William Heller) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:08:08 -0700 Subject: [303rd-Talk] Prone to flames References: <1bb.4a89499.2a888928@aol.com> Message-ID: <3D5815A7.89B1A17A@attglobal.net> Jack, aka Mr. President ... Well written, Lad. Cheers! Sir William von Bsiebsehn Jprencher@aol.com wrote: > Dear Friend Ray: > Gasoline also know as petrol is no doubt highly flammable. As far as I > know all our propeller driven bombers used the stuff for fuel. Oil is > somewhat flammable but has a high flashpoint. Metal airplanes such as B17s > and B24s are not very flammable without the above two items. I suppose a > wooden aircraft such as a mosquito would burn a bit but I doubt if that would > be a problem > Personally I don't know where he got the idea that the B17 was subject to > fires. I flew 35 missions in B17s. We had holes in the plane on 32 of these > missions. sometimes just 2 or 5 or so and once over 300. One in the wing big > enough one could throw a large lounge chair through it if one had a lounge > chair and was quite strong. Many of the fragments and bullets that went > through our plane no doubt went through the fuel tanks as they used up most > of the wing area. Our self sealing tanks worked great and we never once had a > fire it the fuel tank area. We did on two occasions have engine fires, but > in both cases it was gasoline (petrol) that was burning and the fires blew > out when we got the fuel shut off and the engines feathered. I don't want to > start an other war here but I have seen B24s lose a wing and go down on fire > which appeared to be in the main spar which I understand was used as a fuel > tank. > We have all seen pictures of damaged B17s to which I cannot add > anything. but personally our greatest damage was our 300 plus hole damage > from a mission to Merseburg. We got home back to Molesworth with 2 engines > out no brakes, one flat tire, No throttle control on one of our two engines. > and no elevator control except the trim tab. Note: We did not stay in > formation on the way home. I put all our mixtures in Idle cut off, shut off > all the switches on short final and landed dead stick. All 10 of us walked > away with not one wounded crew member but I think our poor bird went to the > scrap pile. I never saw it again while I was there. We did not know about > our flat tire until we landed but it was a blessing. We had no brakes but the > flat tire pulled us off the runway into a big circle on the grass and we came > to a gentle stop. > We were the last ones to land that day as we were a bit slow getting > back to Molesworth. Now you know why I love B17s, Girls and Fried Chicken > with biscuits and gravy. > Best Wishes Ray and Wife, > Jack Rencher From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Mon Aug 12 21:21:42 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (William Heller) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:21:42 -0700 Subject: [303rd-Talk] (Fwd) Robert Morgan's New Book References: <3D57B89D.18428.4FC82@localhost> Message-ID: <3D5818D5.17D304A5@attglobal.net> I walked out of the film "Memphis Belle" after fifteen minutes. Total farce. But, that was Hollywood in those days. WCH Gary Moncur wrote: > ------- Forwarded message follows ------- > Subject: Robert Morgan's New Book > Date sent: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 08:19:49 -0800 > From: "Kevin Pearson" > To: > > Gary: Could you please post the following note, since I am > having trouble sending from Yahoo? > > Robert Morgan has a new book out, titled, "The Man Who Flew the > Memphis Belle." I saw this at Barnes and Noble a few weeks ago > and scawfed at even more glory being awarded the Memphis Belle. > > I was again in Barnes and Noble last week, and decided to take > a > peek at the book. OK, OK, OK, the crew of the Belle have > received a lot of the attention, and I sincerely appreciate > that, but this book really is good. Morgan is very honest > about > his combat tour, his love affairs, and being selected to be the > Eighth Air Force "poster boys." I found it to be a very good > read and I was not expecting the level of honesty contained in > the book. I do recommend this book if you'd like to find out > the real story behind the Belle. So much of what I had heard > and read was off the mark and in some cases downright wrong, > like the Belle's last mission. Wylder's movie made it sound > like Wilhelmhaven, when in fact, it was at Bremen. The intro to > the book brought a tear to my eye it was that good. > > Paperback is $14 here in Alaska. > > Kevin M. Pearson > Vice President, Business Development > Anchorage Economic Development Corporation > 900 W. 5th Ave., Suite 300 > Anchorage, AK 99501 > Phone: 800.462.7275 > 907.258.3700 > Fax: 907.258.6646 > e-mail: kpearson@aedcweb.com > www.aedcweb.com > > ------- End of forwarded message --------- Gary -- Webmaster, > 303rd Bomb Group (H) Association > http://www.303rdBGA.com > http://www.B17Thunderbird.com From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Mon Aug 12 21:16:20 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (William Heller) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:16:20 -0700 Subject: [303rd-Talk] last evening ,viewed memphis belle on dvd. References: <10d.1646b386.2a8968af@aol.com> Message-ID: <3D581793.CEE25A3A@attglobal.net> Do not know about Gobrecht, but ON Base, there were motion Picture units which were making "training" films. Bergeron and I flew a LOT of them and many were laughable. I once had one of the Directors ask me to back up while we were flying. What he wanted was to show the formation we were filming, as going fast. I told him I would pull off the power and he should sweep his cameras and that would give the same result. He thanked me later. Do not know WHO he was. Name of Lux or something like that. We did a lot of these films and nce Bergeron and I did a LOT of landings and takeoffs and the film people made it look like a whole Group was involved. It was TWO planes. The tail numbers were blanked out for obvious reasons. Bergeron and I have seen many of the scenes in which we took part in later "movies" ... So I have come to the coclusion that while these film organizations WERE making "training" films they were ALSO building a film morgue for use in later Hollywood films. I have seen what Bergeron and I did in MANY films, such as Command Decision, Twelve O'Clock High, and many others. We did not "appear" in any MOVIES as such, but were used at Molesworth to do some of this flying I have mentioned above. And you can see MANY films with B17s from our Group which appear in MANY Hollywood post war films. Cheers! WCH IBSPEC@aol.com wrote: > it seemed inconsistent within the movie that there were too many scenes > where oxgen masks were off for overly long periods, at the expected heigt of > flight missions over berlin target, and guess just billy wilder's staff and > us air corps advisors did not check such essential details of flights at > high oxygen starved elevations. however, noted mostly that emergency tanks of > oxygen was present mostly in the travels about aircraft.. others have any > comments on this? another thought, have i read that wm. heller and/or > gorbecht were flyers in filming of this movie? thamks. spec From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Mon Aug 12 21:17:39 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Tooley, Dave) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:17:39 -0500 Subject: [303rd-Talk] Intercom communication Message-ID: <4DF4786A05BDCA4BA5AC00431981688032BA22@a0001-xpo0113-s.hodc.ad.allstate.com> Hi List, Once you guys went on oxygen you had to communicate through the intercom. Was it possible for people to talk to each other without everyone hearing the conversation? For instance, could the P and CP talk privately or the Nav and Bom? What got me thinking on this was if there was an emergency situation, engine on fire or some such, the P and CP would definitely be chatting. So would it be possible for other crewmen to talk over the conversation? I would think that this would not be a good thing as a command given by the P could be missed or misunderstood and cause a further problem. Dave From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Mon Aug 12 22:05:51 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:05:51 EDT Subject: [303rd-Talk] last evening ,viewed memphis belle on dvd. Message-ID: <151.1254d227.2a897d2f@aol.com> bill . did not ya'll get film trailer credits and residuals for you work, even if you were4 not on camera? were ya'll on miltary payroll or on film making scale pay per day? seems at least ya'll should have been credited on film trailers as to ya'll's contribution. gee ,seems ya'll got taken. spec From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Mon Aug 12 22:08:54 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:08:54 EDT Subject: [303rd-Talk] (Fwd) Robert Morgan's New Book Message-ID: <134.12be37fb.2a897de6@aol.com> bill had my grandson, just honorably discharged u. s. regularair force , viewing with me and i was comme4nting as it progressed and he noticed inconsitencies throughout. in movie memohis belle. bill RE: ???? morgan's book . spec From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Mon Aug 12 22:10:35 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:10:35 EDT Subject: [303rd-Talk] Intercom communication Message-ID: i had regular oxygen check inquiries to entire crew during flights in air needing oxygen From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Mon Aug 12 22:28:33 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Bill Jones) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:28:33 -0400 Subject: [303rd-Talk] Prone to flames In-Reply-To: <1bb.4a89499.2a888928@aol.com> Message-ID: <3D57F041.10209.23EA212@localhost> > Personally I don't know where he got the idea that the B17 was > subject to > fires. Just a guess on my part, but is it possible that comment related to when they would use the bomb bay fuel tank to get extra range before the Tokyo tanks were used? I've heard stories about them springing leaks and catching fire. Just a guess. Bill Jones N3JLQ Sweden Maine wejones@megalink.net Main home page http://www.megalink.net/~wejones WWII/B-17 page http://www.megalink.net/~wejones/wwii.html From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Tue Aug 13 01:00:39 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Kevin Pearson) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:00:39 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [303rd-Talk] last evening ,viewed memphis belle on dvd. In-Reply-To: <10d.1646b386.2a8968af@aol.com> Message-ID: <20020813000039.40452.qmail@web12008.mail.yahoo.com> Spec: Wylder used over 100+ cameras in the filming of the original Memphis Belle, not to be confused with the relatively new movie made by his daughter Catherine, The Memphis Belle. He passed the cameras out and told whoever got one they could keep the camera if he could just get the film back. Many shots in the movies were filmed by you vets!! Cameras were scattered within several Bomb Groups - 91st, 303rd, 305th, 94th, and 482nd and 96th. Many 91st Bomb Group vets have watched the opening scenes of Memphis Belle and saw what they believed was the church at Royston at the south end of No. 25 long runway and wondered where the steeple was. This church was actually at Alconbury. Several of the planes pictured in the take-off scenes were filmed at other bases and weren't even 91st a/c.! Here is something from Morgan's new book about the movie I did not know. When you hear the men on the interphone during the combat scenes, ("He's breakin' at 11, breakin' at 11!; and "B-17 out of control at 3 o'clock!"; and "Come on you guys, get outa that plane!"), these were voice overs the crew made after returning to the States. Morgan said the crew was having a ball on their Victory Bond tour, but when they watched those/their scenes of aerial combat a month after returning to the States, it all came flooding back to them. Morgan identified the crew whose B-17 was out of control and it is the first time I actually knew who that crew was. Kevin __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs http://www.hotjobs.com From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Tue Aug 13 02:26:42 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Brian McGuire) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 20:26:42 -0500 Subject: [303rd-Talk] Prone to flames Message-ID:

Hold on, Jack! I understand the B-17, but I haven't heard the girls and biscuits and gravy stories yet. (?????)

Brian S. McGuire

>From: Jprencher@aol.com
>Reply-To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com
>To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com
>Subject: Re: [303rd-Talk] Prone to flames
>Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 23:44:40 EDT
>
>Dear Friend Ray:
> Gasoline also know as petrol is no doubt highly flammable. As far as I
>know all our propeller driven bombers used the stuff for fuel. Oil is
>somewhat flammable but has a high flashpoint. Metal airplanes such as B17s
>and B24s are not very flammable without the above two items. I suppose a
>wooden aircraft such as a mosquito would burn a bit but I doubt if that would
>be a problem
> Personally I don't know where he got the idea that the B17 was subject to
>fires. I flew 35 missions in B17s. We had holes in the plane on 32 of these
>missions. sometimes just 2 or 5 or so and once over 300. One in the wing big
>enough one could throw a large lounge chair through it if one had a lounge
>chair and was quite strong. Many of the fragments and bullets that went
>through our plane no doubt went through the fuel tanks as they used up most
>of the wing area. Our self sealing tanks worked great and we never once had a
>fire it the fuel tank area. We did on two occasions have engine fires, but
>in both cases it was gasoline (petrol) that was burning and the fires blew
>out when we got the fuel shut off and the engines feathered. I don't want to
>start an other war here but I have seen B24s lose a wing and go down on fire
>which appeared to be in the main spar which I understand was used as a fuel
>tank.
> We have all seen pictures of damaged B17s to which I cannot add
>anything. but personally our greatest damage was our 300 plus hole damage
>from a mission to Merseburg. We got home back to Molesworth with 2 engines
>out no brakes, one flat tire, No throttle control on one of our two engines.
>and no elevator control except the trim tab. Note: We did not stay in
>formation on the way home. I put all our mixtures in Idle cut off, shut off
>all the switches on short final and landed dead stick. All 10 of us walked
>away with not one wounded crew member but I think our poor bird went to the
>scrap pile. I never saw it again while I was there. We did not know about
>our flat tire until we landed but it was a blessing. We had no brakes but the
>flat tire pulled us off the runway into a big circle on the grass and we came
>to a gentle stop.
> We were the last ones to land that day as we were a bit slow getting
>back to Molesworth. Now you know why I love B17s, Girls and Fried Chicken
>with biscuits and gravy.
> Best Wishes Ray and Wife,
> Jack Rencher


Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here
From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Tue Aug 13 08:49:58 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (William Heller) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 00:49:58 -0700 Subject: [303rd-Talk] Intercom communication References: <4DF4786A05BDCA4BA5AC00431981688032BA22@a0001-xpo0113-s.hodc.ad.allstate.com> Message-ID: <3D58BA25.C949CB2@attglobal.net> The intercome was a "party" line. But, a well disciplined crew would know if a situation obtained whereby the pilot and copilot (or any other crewmembers) needed the line to themselves. We never had these problems on our crew, BUT, having the party line assisted greatly in how the crew reacted to certain situations. On one mission I had to order my R/O to go into the bomb bay and dislodge a burning bomb if he had to go out with it. The Right Waist Gunner heard this, watched as the R/O did as ordered and IMMEDIATELY went forward with a walk-around bottle AND pulled the R/O from the open bomb bay AFTER he had dislodged the bomb. The R/O received a medal for his bravery. Also,m NBC in the States, in the area of the R/O's home, did a nice 15 minute Radio bit for him. Cheers! "Tooley, Dave" wrote: > Hi List, > Once you guys went on oxygen you had to communicate through the intercom. > Was it possible for people to talk to each other without everyone hearing > the conversation? For instance, could the P and CP talk privately or the > Nav and Bom? > > What got me thinking on this was if there was an emergency situation, engine > on fire or some such, the P and CP would definitely be chatting. So would > it be possible for other crewmen to talk over the conversation? I would > think that this would not be a good thing as a command given by the P could > be missed or misunderstood and cause a further problem. > > Dave From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Tue Aug 13 08:51:33 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (William Heller) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 00:51:33 -0700 Subject: [303rd-Talk] last evening ,viewed memphis belle on dvd. References: <151.1254d227.2a897d2f@aol.com> Message-ID: <3D58BA84.C90C7334@attglobal.net> No such thing NOR did such even enter our minds. We were doing our duty as ordered. (PS: This did not occur in the climate of today. This was in a war which we WON). Cheers! IBSPEC@aol.com wrote: > bill . did not ya'll get film trailer credits and residuals for you work, > even if you were4 not on camera? were ya'll on miltary payroll or on film > making scale pay per day? seems at least ya'll should have been credited on > film trailers as to ya'll's contribution. gee ,seems ya'll got taken. spec From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Tue Aug 13 10:44:11 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (ray.cossey1) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:44:11 +0100 Subject: [303rd-Talk] Prone to flames References: Message-ID: <003001c242ae$a3d911d0$1fe8fc3e@RAY> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0017_01C242B6.5BD4F7C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mr President Rencher I agree with Brian McGuire. We know you know just about all there is to = know about the B-17, but what's this with the 'girls, fried chicken and = biscuits and gravy'.=20 During the war, we know some of you 'had' (can't think of any more = polite way to put it) some of our girls. You may well have had plenty of = fried chicken, but only on base, as we English folk never had enough = meat to feed a flea!=20 As for the 'biscuits and gravy', what is that all about? Come on, Mr = President, come clean on all three items! Warmest personal regards, Jack Ray & Theresa (her with the MBE) ------=_NextPart_000_0017_01C242B6.5BD4F7C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mr President Rencher
 
I agree with Brian McGuire. We know you = know just=20 about all there is to know about the B-17, but what's this with the = 'girls,=20 fried chicken and biscuits and gravy'.
 
During the war, we know some of you = 'had' (can't=20 think of any more polite way to put it) some of our girls. You may well = have had=20 plenty of fried chicken, but only on base, as we English folk never had = enough=20 meat to feed a flea!
 
As for the 'biscuits and gravy', what = is that all=20 about?  Come on, Mr President, come clean on all three = items!
 
Warmest personal regards, = Jack
 
Ray & Theresa (her with the=20 MBE)
------=_NextPart_000_0017_01C242B6.5BD4F7C0-- From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Tue Aug 13 20:05:25 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:05:25 EDT Subject: [303rd-Talk] Prone to flames Message-ID: <91.217e0638.2a8ab275@aol.com> Brian, I was just bragging a bit about the Girls and the biscuits and gravy are just really out of the question as I get to fat to fast. The B17 had an element of truth in it but I am rather fond of P63s, P38s and Beech Bonanzas too. Not near so much as B17s though as we have been through Hell and High water (Clouds) to much and to often not to have bonded. What a privilege for someone like me to have a friend like you. Thank You. Best Wishes, Jack From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Tue Aug 13 13:12:26 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Bob Hand) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 08:12:26 -0400 Subject: [303rd-Talk] last evening ,viewed memphis belle on dvd. In-Reply-To: <20020813000039.40452.qmail@web12008.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Something missing from every intercom transmission in 'Belle and others was the heartbeat of the person involved, plus pickup of the engine's roar sometimes a hasty prayer, etc., etc. And of course, those spanking clean uniforms of the Hollywood version were a give-away. Not to mention the full size cut-out reproductions of B-17s stashed in the distance to resemble actual aircraft. Still nothing there like Hughes' "Hell's Angels" Cheers! Bob Hand > From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Tue Aug 13 20:41:47 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Tooley, Dave) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 14:41:47 -0500 Subject: [303rd-Talk] Intercom communication Message-ID: <4DF4786A05BDCA4BA5AC0043198168803272AF@a0001-xpo0113-s.hodc.ad.allstate.com> Bill, Thanks for the intercom answer. As for the burning bomb, that had to be an incendiary, right? Dave -----Original Message----- From: William Heller [mailto:wheller@attglobal.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 2:50 AM To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Subject: Re: [303rd-Talk] Intercom communication The intercome was a "party" line. But, a well disciplined crew would know if a situation obtained whereby the pilot and copilot (or any other crewmembers) needed the line to themselves. We never had these problems on our crew, BUT, having the party line assisted greatly in how the crew reacted to certain situations. On one mission I had to order my R/O to go into the bomb bay and dislodge a burning bomb if he had to go out with it. The Right Waist Gunner heard this, watched as the R/O did as ordered and IMMEDIATELY went forward with a walk-around bottle AND pulled the R/O from the open bomb bay AFTER he had dislodged the bomb. The R/O received a medal for his bravery. Also,m NBC in the States, in the area of the R/O's home, did a nice 15 minute Radio bit for him. Cheers! "Tooley, Dave" wrote: > Hi List, > Once you guys went on oxygen you had to communicate through the intercom. > Was it possible for people to talk to each other without everyone hearing > the conversation? For instance, could the P and CP talk privately or the > Nav and Bom? > > What got me thinking on this was if there was an emergency situation, engine > on fire or some such, the P and CP would definitely be chatting. So would > it be possible for other crewmen to talk over the conversation? I would > think that this would not be a good thing as a command given by the P could > be missed or misunderstood and cause a further problem. > > Dave From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Tue Aug 13 20:44:48 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Pierce, Gregory S) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 12:44:48 -0700 Subject: [303rd-Talk] RE: Bill Mauldin Message-ID: Concerning "Up Front" Cartoonist Bill Mauldin He suffered terrible burns in a household accident a while back; his health has deteriorated grievously, and his cognitive functions are barely working. He lives in a room in a nursing home in Orange County, Calif., and sometimes days at a time go by without him saying a word. He was married three times, but the last one ended in divorce, and at 80 in the nursing home Mauldin is a single man. Members of his family have said that, even though Bill hardly communicates, the one thing that cheers him up is hearing from World War II guys -- the men for whom he drew those magnificent cartoons. But it's his World War II contemporaries he seems to need now. The guys for whom -- in the words of Mauldin's son David -- Mauldin's cartoons "were like water for men dying of thirst." David Mauldin said his dad needs to hear that he meant something to those men. He needs visitors, and he needs cards of encouragement. I'm not going to print the name of the nursing home, so that this can be done in a disciplined and scheduled way. A newspaper colleague in Southern California -- Gordon Dillow -- has done a wonderful job organizing this, and he will take your cards to the nursing home. You may send them to Bill Mauldin in care of Dillow at the Orange County Register, 625 N. Grand Ave., Santa Ana, CA 92701. What would be even better, for those of you World War II veterans who are reading these words in California, or who plan on traveling there soon, would be if you could pay a visit to Mauldin just to sit with him a while. You can let me know if you are willing to do this (bgreene@tribune.com), or you can let Gordon Dillow know (gldillow@aol.com). Bill Mauldin brought hope, and smiles in terrible hours, to millions of his fellow soldiers. If you were one of them, and you'd like to repay the favor, this would be the time. Greg Pierce E-mail gregory.s.pierce@boeing.com From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Tue Aug 13 21:20:10 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (William Heller) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:20:10 -0700 Subject: [303rd-Talk] Intercom communication References: <4DF4786A05BDCA4BA5AC0043198168803272AF@a0001-xpo0113-s.hodc.ad.allstate.com> Message-ID: <3D5969F9.AF7775A2@attglobal.net> Yep! WCH "Tooley, Dave" wrote: > Bill, > Thanks for the intercom answer. As for the burning bomb, that had to be an > incendiary, right? > > Dave > > -----Original Message----- > From: William Heller [mailto:wheller@attglobal.net] > Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 2:50 AM > To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com > Subject: Re: [303rd-Talk] Intercom communication > > The intercome was a "party" line. But, a well disciplined crew would know if > a > situation obtained whereby the pilot and copilot (or any other crewmembers) > needed the line to themselves. We never had these problems on our crew, BUT, > having the party line assisted greatly in how the crew reacted to certain > situations. On one mission I had to order my R/O to go into the bomb bay and > dislodge a burning bomb if he had to go out with it. The Right Waist Gunner > heard this, watched as the R/O did as ordered and IMMEDIATELY went forward > with > a walk-around bottle AND pulled the R/O from the open bomb bay AFTER he had > dislodged the bomb. The R/O received a medal for his bravery. Also,m NBC in > the States, in the area of the R/O's home, did a nice 15 minute Radio bit > for > him. > > Cheers! > > "Tooley, Dave" wrote: > > > Hi List, > > Once you guys went on oxygen you had to communicate through the intercom. > > Was it possible for people to talk to each other without everyone hearing > > the conversation? For instance, could the P and CP talk privately or the > > Nav and Bom? > > > > What got me thinking on this was if there was an emergency situation, > engine > > on fire or some such, the P and CP would definitely be chatting. So would > > it be possible for other crewmen to talk over the conversation? I would > > think that this would not be a good thing as a command given by the P > could > > be missed or misunderstood and cause a further problem. > > > > Dave From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Tue Aug 13 21:37:04 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Pierce, Gregory S) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:37:04 -0700 Subject: [303rd-Talk] "The Man Who Flew the Memphis Belle" Message-ID: I would echo what Kevin has written about Col. Robert Morgan's book "The Man Who Flew the Memphis Belle". I checked it out of the library and found his story to be balanced and honest. He shared his high points and low points, victories and failures. It added dimension to the Memphis Belle story. For the recorded gentlemen their were two movies entitled "Memphis Belle". The 1943 USAAF movie/documentary and the 1989 Warner Brothers "Fiction" movie. The 1989 version was very fictional and heavily "Hollywoodized" and did not give a good account of what the 8th AF/B-17 crews was about. I say that Hollywood has yet to match 12 o'clock High! Did you hit anything up there Harvey? Well Sir, my glasses were a bit fogged up but I think I got a piece of one! Ours or theirs? From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Tue Aug 13 22:58:14 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Kevin Pearson) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 14:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [303rd-Talk] last evening ,viewed memphis belle on dvd. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20020813215814.5701.qmail@web12006.mail.yahoo.com> Bob: Thanks for your comments about the cut out B-17s in the distance. I will look for these tonight as I don't remember seeing them before. Kevin __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs http://www.hotjobs.com From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Tue Aug 13 23:12:16 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Kevin Pearson) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:12:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [303rd-Talk] "The Memphis Belle" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20020813221216.7881.qmail@web12006.mail.yahoo.com> I know the 1989 movie The Memphis Belle was totally innacurate, but seeing those Forts in flight, you must admit, it still is an awesome sight. I wasn't there with you fellows, and I know the inaccuracies raise your hackles, but I still watch both movies from time to time. 12 o'clock high was a great movie, probably the best, but I still like The War Lover with Steve McQueen. The set(s) used had to be at a former English base. Steve McQueen even had real RAF Flying Boots, which were preferred over the American made version from what I have been told. Do any of you have any thoughts on the movie The War Lover. Sure the Hollywood story line is totally out of step with reality, but the combat footage and flying sequences appear accurate. ( I'm still a sucker for that Big Triangle A, not to mention Triangle Cs!!) Kevin __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs http://www.hotjobs.com From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Tue Aug 13 23:49:37 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Bob Hand) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 18:49:37 -0400 Subject: [303rd-Talk] last evening ,viewed memphis belle on dvd. In-Reply-To: <20020813215814.5701.qmail@web12006.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: The B-17 "cut-outs" are hardly detectable...Hollywood's good at that. For a great read, see a book called "Celluloid Wings" The Impact of Movies on Aviation. By James H. Farmer TAB BOOKS, INC. Book has a completely detailed description of the making of "12 O'Clock High" but was in print before the making of the Hollywood version of " Memphis Belle"...it does, however, have a short write-up of the 1944 version, which names groups, individuals, who contributed to making the film. Will have to run through my tape to see if I can spot the phony phortresses. Used to be easy when they flew Travelair Biplanes painted to look like Fokkers in the oldies. Good Health and Cheers....Bob Hand > From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Wed Aug 14 00:19:34 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Kevin Pearson) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:19:34 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [303rd-Talk] Memphis Belle and Phony Phortresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20020813231934.36620.qmail@web12004.mail.yahoo.com> Bob: I love your description of Phony Phortresses! Brilliant, to use a phrase of my friends across the pond! And thanks a bunch for that reference to "Celluloid Wings." I am most interested in anything about the original Memphis Belle movie and will definitely try to find it. If you can spot about where the phony phorts are on the tape, I'd sure like to know. I am absolutely amazed at what you guys have and are teaching me and it is very much appreciated! You guys are the best!! Cheers! Kevin __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs http://www.hotjobs.com From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Wed Aug 14 02:42:52 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Brian McGuire) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 20:42:52 -0500 Subject: [303rd-Talk] Prone to flames Message-ID:

Au contraire, mon ami. The honor is mine.

VR,

Brian

Brian S. McGuire

>From: Jprencher@aol.com
>Reply-To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com
>To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com
>Subject: Re: [303rd-Talk] Prone to flames
>Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:05:25 EDT
>
>Brian,
> I was just bragging a bit about the Girls and the biscuits and gravy are
>just really out of the question as I get to fat to fast. The B17 had an
>element of truth in it but I am rather fond of P63s, P38s and Beech Bonanzas
>too. Not near so much as B17s though as we have been through Hell and High
>water (Clouds) to much and to often not to have bonded. What a privilege for
>someone like me to have a friend like you.
> Thank You. Best Wishes,
> Jack
>
>


MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: Click Here
From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Wed Aug 14 03:01:02 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Brian McGuire) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 21:01:02 -0500 Subject: [303rd-Talk] Prone to flames Message-ID:

Ray -

I had idea idea Theresa was an MBE. Quite an honor. Please offer my congrats. While I was in England I helped Mick Sargeant, friend of Bill Adams, nominate get Bill for inclusion in the Queen's annual honors, but, alas, it has not come to pass.

Brian S. McGuire

>From: "ray.cossey1"
>Reply-To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com
>To: <303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com>
>Subject: Re: [303rd-Talk] Prone to flames
>Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:44:11 +0100
>
>Mr President Rencher
>
>I agree with Brian McGuire. We know you know just about all there is to know about the B-17, but what's this with the 'girls, fried chicken and biscuits and gravy'.
>
>During the war, we know some of you 'had' (can't think of any more polite way to put it) some of our girls. You may well have had plenty of fried chicken, but only on base, as we English folk never had enough meat to feed a flea!
>
>As for the 'biscuits and gravy', what is that all about? Come on, Mr President, come clean on all three items!
>
>Warmest personal regards, Jack
>
>Ray & Theresa (her with the MBE)


Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here
From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Wed Aug 14 03:07:12 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 22:07:12 EDT Subject: [303rd-Talk] Prone to flames Message-ID: <182.ca76721.2a8b1550@aol.com> oui!!! From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Wed Aug 14 07:52:10 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 02:52:10 EDT Subject: [303rd-Talk] My conduct in England Message-ID: <113.15b77249.2a8b581a@aol.com> Dear Friend Ray: Because of my letter concerning our B17s in your wonderful land I would like to clarify what might have been somewhat misleading. Believe me I am not talking about some of my fellow airman in the following statements but I feel sure I am speaking for more than our reputation would have you believe. While your guest in your land I did NOT (Never ever) not even once. do any of the following:(1) Violate any Young (or old) English girls. (2) Fly into and knock down any Church steeples (3) Eat fried chicken unless it was in an army mess hall and I have no recollection of even doing that. (4) Pick up or patronize any Picadilly commandos (5) learn how to spell Picadilly.I did eat fish & chips a few times and felt guilty about that. I also held hands a bit with 2 sisters Molly and Sheila Baker. I wish I knew what happened to them I was very fond of them. I left my very good BSA bicycle for their Brother In Law, who was in the English Army, when I left. I hope he survived and got it. Good Night Ray. It's about 8:45AM where you are unless of course you are somewhere else and if so I have no idea what time it is where ever that may be. Very Best Wishes, Jack From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Wed Aug 14 05:39:43 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Mike McClanahan) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 22:39:43 -0600 Subject: [303rd-Talk] RE: Wyler film footage In-Reply-To: <20020813160224.3D27153698@pairlist.net> Message-ID: While Kevin is certainly right that the Hollywood types weren't too fussy about cutting scenes and aircraft out of context into their "documentaries," let me insert a comment to the discussion, if I may. Don't know how many times I've watched Wm. Wyler's "Memphis Belle," but it's a bunch (I could only stand to watch his daughter Susan's version twice without yelling back at the screen). And every time I saw it, I smugly said to myself "Look at those QE's and XM's. They're not even from the 91st !" True enough, but had I dug a little deeper, I would have learned that QE & XM are from the 331st and 332nd Squads of the 94th and that in May of '43, the 94th was sharing bases with the 91st at Bassingbourn and the 306th at Thurleigh while they waited for their own base at Rougham to be ready for them. So the footage showing them taking off with the Belle is accurate! When you have gasbags like Andy Rooney and plagiarists like some "authorities" who have worked their way into positions of honor at our most sacred museums, it's easy (and often accurate) to tar and feather the PR flacks working for Hollywood and the War Department during the war. But sometimes there are actually little gems of trivia to be learned from what seem to be errors. From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Wed Aug 14 12:46:24 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Tooley, Dave) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 06:46:24 -0500 Subject: [303rd-Talk] "The Man Who Flew the Memphis Belle" Message-ID: <4DF4786A05BDCA4BA5AC0043198168803272B1@a0001-xpo0113-s.hodc.ad.allstate.com> Greg, I concur completely on your 12 O'clock High statement. Best movie of it's kind ever. And you even mentioned my favorite scene in the movie!! What a guy!! You made my morning!! Thanks! Dave From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Wed Aug 14 13:06:47 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Bill Owen) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:06:47 -0500 Subject: [303rd-Talk] Memphis Belle Documentary Message-ID: <002201c2438b$11b9ce60$6c68db40@billowen> Kevin and others that want to see the Memphis Belle documentary made by William Wyler in 1943. I asked my local Blockbuster video store to see if they might have it and sure enough they came up with it. It took a few days but they found it and I rented it. Cheers, Bill Owen From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Wed Aug 14 13:39:00 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Bob Hand) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:39:00 -0400 Subject: [303rd-Talk] Memphis Belle and Phony Phortresses In-Reply-To: <20020813231934.36620.qmail@web12004.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: I must dig up "War Lover" from my philes and again watch the antics of McQueen as he infiltrates the relationship between Bob Wagner and his sweetie...there was one of these characters on every base. He cuts in on the dance floor and off goes the date you've spent all evening wining and dining. (She calls you the next day and explains, "I just couldn't help myself!"....yeah, sure.) Sound familiar? Cheers, Bob Hand From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Wed Aug 14 13:52:58 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Bob Hand) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:52:58 -0400 Subject: [303rd-Talk] I phound it, I phound it! In-Reply-To: <20020813231934.36620.qmail@web12004.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: I knew I'd phind it if I looked long enough...another definitive book on stunt flying in the movies...oddly enough called "STUNT FLYING IN THE MOVIES" BY Jim & Maxine Greenwood, TAB BOOKS (1982) Great read and chuck phull of photos and phacts on the pilots who made movies exciting...Tallman and Mantz are all over the place.> Unphortunately, this book preceded the latter philming of "Memphis Belle". Good Health and Cheers, Bob Hand From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Wed Aug 14 16:56:16 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Kevin Pearson) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:56:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [303rd-Talk] RE: Wyler film footage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20020814155616.47958.qmail@web12008.mail.yahoo.com> Mike, that is another very facinating fact I did not know. Thanks for contributing. I have also heard Wylder made 20 versions of Memphis Belle before he was finally satisfied with the final version. Cheers Kevin --- Mike McClanahan wrote: > While Kevin is certainly right that the Hollywood > types weren't too > fussy about cutting scenes and aircraft out of > context into their > "documentaries," let me insert a comment to the > discussion, if I may. > > Don't know how many times I've watched Wm. Wyler's > "Memphis Belle," but > it's a bunch (I could only stand to watch his > daughter Susan's version > twice without yelling back at the screen). And > every time I saw it, I > smugly said to myself "Look at those QE's and XM's. > They're not even > from the 91st !" > > True enough, but had I dug a little deeper, I would > have learned that QE > & XM are from the 331st and 332nd Squads of the 94th > and that in May of > '43, the 94th was sharing bases with the 91st at > Bassingbourn and the > 306th at Thurleigh while they waited for their own > base at Rougham to be > ready for them. So the footage showing them taking > off with the Belle > is accurate! > > When you have gasbags like Andy Rooney and > plagiarists like some > "authorities" who have worked their way into > positions of honor at our > most sacred museums, it's easy (and often accurate) > to tar and feather > the PR flacks working for Hollywood and the War > Department during the > war. But sometimes there are actually little gems > of trivia to be > learned from what seem to be errors. > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs http://www.hotjobs.com From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Wed Aug 14 17:07:32 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Jack Parker) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:07:32 -0500 Subject: [303rd-Talk] New member Message-ID: <000801c243ac$b40445d0$04a985ce@yourg4lzvxou0c> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C24382.C96E1740 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This is to inform all members that my dad, Jack Parker is now on the = chat line. He's new to computers so it may take a while for him to = respond.My name is J.D. Parker and my address is j.d.parker@juno.com. = Dad was in the 359th from May to Nov. '44. He was Co-pilot with William = Morgan's group until he got his own plane. His picture is on your site = and he was the pilot of the Bonnie B when it received the damage shown = in the picture. Dad's health is failing ( He's 80 ) but we will try to = get him to share as much of his experiences as possible. Thanks! ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C24382.C96E1740 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This is to inform all members that my = dad, Jack=20 Parker is now on the chat line. He's new to computers so it may take a = while for=20 him to respond.My name is J.D. Parker and my address is j.d.parker@juno.com. Dad was in = the 359th=20 from May to Nov. '44. He was Co-pilot with William Morgan's group until = he got=20 his own plane. His picture is on your site and he was the pilot of the = Bonnie B=20 when it received the damage shown in the picture. Dad's health is = failing ( He's=20 80 ) but we will try to get him to share as much of his experiences as = possible.=20 Thanks!
------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C24382.C96E1740-- From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Thu Aug 15 00:32:56 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 19:32:56 EDT Subject: [303rd-Talk] New member Message-ID: welcome jack parker . jump in tell us all about it From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Thu Aug 15 03:17:31 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Brian McGuire) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 21:17:31 -0500 Subject: [303rd-Talk] Memphis Belle and Phony Phortresses Message-ID:

One thing that ruined the film for me was the bailout scene, where they use a model and toy parachute and it looked so fake you couldn't help but to laugh. Even the end scene where McQueen meets the cliffs of Dover looked so fake you had to wonder how low their budget was. Would be interested in what others may think of the rest of the movie.

Brian S. McGuire

>From: Bob Hand
>Reply-To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com
>To: <303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com>
>Subject: Re: [303rd-Talk] Memphis Belle and Phony Phortresses
>Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:39:00 -0400
>
>I must dig up "War Lover" from my philes and again watch the antics of
>McQueen as he infiltrates the relationship between Bob Wagner and his
>sweetie...there was one of these characters on every base. He cuts in on the
>dance floor and off goes the date you've spent all evening wining and
>dining. (She calls you the next day and explains, "I just couldn't help
>myself!"....yeah, sure.) Sound familiar? Cheers, Bob Hand
>
>


MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: Click Here
From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Thu Aug 15 06:28:56 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Mike McClanahan) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 23:28:56 -0600 Subject: [303rd-Talk] RE: Wylers and movies In-Reply-To: <20020814160114.77D475374F@pairlist.net> Message-ID: For some reason I keep referring to Wm Wyler's daughter as Susan, when her name is Catherine, as Kevin correctly stated in his message. Must be some sort of Phreudian thing. Re the '43 Memphis Belle and The War Lover, I was able to check both out from the Denver Public Library with my library card (saved a few bucks). I'm gonna try Combat America and Command Decision next time I'm there. Sometimes larger libraries are a good source for hard-to-find movies. Mike McClanahan From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Thu Aug 15 09:20:59 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (William Heller) Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 01:20:59 -0700 Subject: [303rd-Talk] Memphis Belle and Phony Phortresses References: Message-ID: <3D5B646A.6310F6DC@attglobal.net> --------------60E1DCC90517B313AD5A28FC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The movie was a total joke, Brian. A vehicle for McQueen who had not just made it yet. And, an opportunity to use some of the "morgue" shots that those Motion Picture Units had after working at our Air Bases. Some say 12 O'clock High was about as original as you can get. Especially the Dean Jagger scene at the beginning and end. I agree with that. But for me, BEING there was as actual as you can get and yet, today, there are those who just do not want to hear us tell it like it was .... The other day a local young lady saw my 8th AF Bolo Tie and asked me what it represented. When I told her it was from the famous 8th AF of WW#2, she asked me WHEN was WW#2! As I began to tell her, I stopped and asked, "What do you do for a living?" She said she was an elementary school teacher! It is to be sad. Cheers! Brian McGuire wrote: > > > One thing that ruined the film for me was the bailout > scene, where they use a model and toy parachute and it > looked so fake you couldn't help but to laugh. Even the > end scene where McQueen meets the cliffs of Dover looked > so fake you had to wonder how low their budget was. Would > be interested in what others may think of the rest of the > movie. > > Brian S. McGuire>From: Bob Hand > >Reply-To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com > >To: <303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com> > >Subject: Re: [303rd-Talk] Memphis Belle and Phony > Phortresses > >Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:39:00 -0400 > > > >I must dig up "War Lover" from my philes and again watch > the antics of > >McQueen as he infiltrates the relationship between Bob > Wagner and his > >sweetie...there was one of these characters on every > base. He cuts in on the > >dance floor and off goes the date you've spent all > evening wining and > >dining. (She calls you the next day and explains, "I just > couldn't help > >myself!"....yeah, sure.) Sound familiar? Cheers, Bob Hand > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your > photos: Click Here --------------60E1DCC90517B313AD5A28FC Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The movie was a total joke, Brian. A vehicle for McQueen who had not just made it yet. And, an opportunity to use some of the "morgue" shots that those Motion Picture Units had after working at our Air Bases.  Some say 12 O'clock High was about as original as you can get. Especially the Dean Jagger scene at the beginning and end.  I agree with that. But for me, BEING there was as actual as you can get and yet, today, there are those who just do not want to hear us tell it like it was ....  The other day a local young lady saw my 8th AF Bolo Tie and asked me what it represented. When I told her it was from the famous 8th AF of WW#2, she asked me WHEN was WW#2!   As I began to tell her, I stopped and asked, "What do you do for a living?"  She said she was an elementary school teacher! It is to be sad.

Cheers!
 
 

Brian McGuire wrote:

 

One thing that ruined the film for me was the bailout scene, where they use a model and toy parachute and it looked so fake you couldn't help but to laugh. Even the end scene where McQueen meets the cliffs of Dover looked so fake you had to wonder how low their budget was. Would be interested in what others may think of the rest of the movie.

Brian S. McGuire>From: Bob Hand 
>Reply-To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com
>To: <303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com>
>Subject: Re: [303rd-Talk] Memphis Belle and Phony Phortresses
>Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:39:00 -0400
>
>I must dig up "War Lover" from my philes and again watch the antics of
>McQueen as he infiltrates the relationship between Bob Wagner and his
>sweetie...there was one of these characters on every base. He cuts in on the
>dance floor and off goes the date you've spent all evening wining and
>dining. (She calls you the next day and explains, "I just couldn't help
>myself!"....yeah, sure.) Sound familiar? Cheers, Bob Hand
>
>



MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: Click Here
--------------60E1DCC90517B313AD5A28FC-- From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Thu Aug 15 10:13:52 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Mary Jo Hangartner) Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 09:13:52 +0000 Subject: [303rd-Talk] Hollywood version of "Memphis Belle" Message-ID: I am the daughter of a member of the 8th Air Force (James M. Pierce), who had to bail out of his B-17 on his 11th mission, and who was at Molesworth from May 27, 1944 to October 6, 1944. I am also an 8th grade Language Arts teacher who teaches an extensive WWII literature unit. I would just like to say that it was not until the Hollywood version of the movie that my dad even began to talk about his war experiences, and he still is quite guarded about what he will share with his family. I have often asked him if he would speak to my students, and he refuses, partly because that just is not his style, and partly because of the questions that the 8th grade boys will ask. I use the Hollywood version of "Memphis Belle" in my classroom after we have also read the play "The Diary of Anne Frank." Then we have a boy's and a girl's perspective, two different countries and two very different situations, but both of young people and how they were affected by WWII. I also have available "Suicide Missions, Ball Turret Gunners" which I bought for Dad as he does not have cable to watch it. Am I giving my students a terribly inaccurate picture by using these Hollywood versions of movies? My thoughts are that at least I am getting them interested and asking questions about that point in history. Dad has also pointed out many things about the Hollywood "Memphis Belle" which were not accurate at all. In the end, my students are asked to find someone else's story, someone who was also between the ages of 10 and 25 during the war, anywhere in the world, and then they write and tell the class the story that they have found. They can use true accounts in books, interview someone in person, or correspond with someone via email. I will retell them my dad's story, as best I know it, as an example. Every year there are a handful of students, mostly boys, who comment that this is "the best" thing that we have done in this class. Others have commented that my class is more like Social Studies than Language Arts ; I also consider that a compliment as I tend to enjoy true stories even more than the fictional ones. Just wanted to let you know that I am doing my best to generate interest in what these men did out of appreciation to all of you and Dad, but at the same time hope that I am not over-glamorizing war. The kids have brought in some interesting speakers on their own, as well as audio and videotapes to accompany their written stories. From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Thu Aug 15 16:07:35 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (bill runnels) Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 08:07:35 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [303rd-Talk] Hollywood version of "Memphis Belle" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20020815150735.76664.qmail@web40209.mail.yahoo.com> Mary Jo, thanks for your outstanding work on teaching the WW11 Literature unit. Movies like " Memphis Belle" are intended to be entertaining. They also tell a story that needs to be remembered. Those of us who experienced a bit of the action can identify the many flaws but so be it. Keep up the terrific effort. It is appreciated......Bill Runnels, Bombardier --- Mary Jo Hangartner <hangart@salamander.com> wrote: > I am the daughter of a member of the 8th Air Force > (James M. Pierce), who > had to bail out of his B-17 on his 11th mission, and > who was at Molesworth > from May 27, 1944 to October 6, 1944. I am also an > 8th grade Language Arts > teacher who teaches an extensive WWII literature > unit. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs http://www.hotjobs.com From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Thu Aug 15 18:00:43 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Pierce, Gregory S) Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 10:00:43 -0700 Subject: [303rd-Talk] Teaching WWII History 101 Message-ID: Dear Mary, First off, thank you for making the effort to teach on this subject called WWII. It shaped the world and the doctrines that we live in today, it also shaped, killed and mamed millions of indivduals from that time period. I have studied history for years and majored in it while in College. You pose the question: "Am I giving my students a terribly inaccurate picture by using these Hollywood versions of movies? If you going to teach HISTORY give the student FACT's not someone else FICTION that was designed to make money i.e. Hollywood movies. Your best source of historical facts are from the people who were there! Make good use of these great veterans NOW. I was invited to talk to a High School history class and took 303rd BG pilot Col. Mel Schulstad with me, we were aghast to learn that the teacher was using the Black Humor / Fictitious Book "Catch-22" for teaching history, this to me was VERY misguided and showed the ignorance of the teacher. In Summary: If the student is truly interested in the subject he or she will "dig" deeper and form their own opinions, give them a good fact filled baseline to start from. The Men and Woman who fought and died in this world wide effort deserve nothing less. The best debates are based upon irrefutable facts. Thank you, One Pierce's opnion. Greg Pierce President, 8th AFHS - WA Chapter E-mail gregory.s.pierce@boeing.com Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 09:13:52 +0000 From: "Mary Jo Hangartner" To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Subject: [303rd-Talk] Hollywood version of "Memphis Belle" Reply-To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com I am the daughter of a member of the 8th Air Force (James M. Pierce), who had to bail out of his B-17 on his 11th mission, and who was at Molesworth from May 27, 1944 to October 6, 1944. I am also an 8th grade Language Arts teacher who teaches an extensive WWII literature unit. I would just like to say that it was not until the Hollywood version of the movie that my dad even began to talk about his war experiences, and he still is quite guarded about what he will share with his family. I have often asked him if he would speak to my students, and he refuses, partly because that just is not his style, and partly because of the questions that the 8th grade boys will ask. From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Thu Aug 15 16:59:13 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Tooley, Dave) Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 10:59:13 -0500 Subject: [303rd-Talk] Hollywood version of "Memphis Belle" Message-ID: <4DF4786A05BDCA4BA5AC00431981688032BA28@a0001-xpo0113-s.hodc.ad.allstate.com> Mary Jo, First let me say that I wish there were more teachers out there like you. Keep up the excellent job!! Now for Memphis Belle (MB) and my 2 cents. Technically MB is not completely accurate. You've read enough here over the last few days to understand that. However, let's look at the movie from a human standpoint. What does the movie tell us: these were young men from everywhere and every background. They were scared, they had dreams and plans for the future, they were loyal to each other and they set their inadequacies aside when another was in need, it hurt when another plane went down, their commanding officer cared deeply about them, they each dealt with the war in their own way, one guy was so MACHO that he wrote poetry and when read to the others was not chastised or laughed at, but respected. Need I go on? Kids today need to understand more about the PEOPLE who lived, fought and died during that horrible time. On both sides of the conflict. War is evil, dirty, bloody and a disgusting event. So what if MB isn't technically correct. It still has some value in other respects. When my wife and sons watched this movie, they didn't say, Hey you can't walk around at 20,000 feet without oxygen! They said, Hey, these guys went through hell and I really respect and admire what they did. I hope that my 3 sons won't have to experience what their grandfathers and uncles had to. Okay I'll climb down from the soapbox. I would like to suggest another movie to view and that is 12 O'clock High. More accurate technically and just as human. In my opinion it's one of the finest movies made of any kind, anywhere. Take care, Dave -----Original Message----- From: Mary Jo Hangartner [mailto:hangart@salamander.com] Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 4:14 AM To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Subject: [303rd-Talk] Hollywood version of "Memphis Belle" I am the daughter of a member of the 8th Air Force (James M. Pierce), who had to bail out of his B-17 on his 11th mission, and who was at Molesworth from May 27, 1944 to October 6, 1944. I am also an 8th grade Language Arts teacher who teaches an extensive WWII literature unit. I would just like to say that it was not until the Hollywood version of the movie that my dad even began to talk about his war experiences, and he still is quite guarded about what he will share with his family. I have often asked him if he would speak to my students, and he refuses, partly because that just is not his style, and partly because of the questions that the 8th grade boys will ask. I use the Hollywood version of "Memphis Belle" in my classroom after we have also read the play "The Diary of Anne Frank." Then we have a boy's and a girl's perspective, two different countries and two very different situations, but both of young people and how they were affected by WWII. I also have available "Suicide Missions, Ball Turret Gunners" which I bought for Dad as he does not have cable to watch it. Am I giving my students a terribly inaccurate picture by using these Hollywood versions of movies? My thoughts are that at least I am getting them interested and asking questions about that point in history. Dad has also pointed out many things about the Hollywood "Memphis Belle" which were not accurate at all. In the end, my students are asked to find someone else's story, someone who was also between the ages of 10 and 25 during the war, anywhere in the world, and then they write and tell the class the story that they have found. They can use true accounts in books, interview someone in person, or correspond with someone via email. I will retell them my dad's story, as best I know it, as an example. Every year there are a handful of students, mostly boys, who comment that this is "the best" thing that we have done in this class. Others have commented that my class is more like Social Studies than Language Arts ; I also consider that a compliment as I tend to enjoy true stories even more than the fictional ones. Just wanted to let you know that I am doing my best to generate interest in what these men did out of appreciation to all of you and Dad, but at the same time hope that I am not over-glamorizing war. The kids have brought in some interesting speakers on their own, as well as audio and videotapes to accompany their written stories. From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Thu Aug 15 21:36:45 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com) Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 16:36:45 EDT Subject: [303rd-Talk] Living History Message-ID: <3c.22ab50b9.2a8d6add@aol.com> --part1_3c.22ab50b9.2a8d6add_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'm writing in response to Mary Jo Hargartner. I understand how difficult it can be to get information from your Dad. Mine is the same way. (You guys who know him won't believe it, but is true.) I've learned his story over the years primarily in a secondhand fashion he'll talk to others much easier than his own kids. I urge you to find someone to record you Dad's story. One of state university's history dept. sent some to interview Dad (my sister-in-law sat back in a corner a video taped it) and he gave them the letters that he sent home and vise versa and they are now part of the archives. Also, Congress passed a resolution to record the personal histories of as many vets of 20th century conflicts as possible. It's the responsibility of each state's senators to see that it's done so method's vary state to state. In Indiana we are lucky in that Senator Lugar has taken it very seriously. A college student who was about to enter the military was the volunteer who came out and recorded Dad's story and photos now and then with him. ALL of the histories are to be entered into the Library of Congress. I would urge all of you to contact your Senator's office to help insure that your stories survive. Heidi Girman (daughter of Gene Girman) PS: Dad is at Lakeside VA in Chicago for at least the next week or so learning to use his new leg. With his various medical problems it hasn't been easy but he's a trooper and working very hard. --part1_3c.22ab50b9.2a8d6add_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'm writing in response to Mary Jo Hargartner. I understand how difficult it can be to get information from your Dad. Mine is the same way. (You guys who know him won't believe it, but is true.) I've learned his story over the years primarily in a secondhand fashion he'll talk to others much easier than his own kids. I urge you to find someone to record you Dad's story. One of state university's history dept. sent some to interview Dad (my sister-in-law sat back in a corner a video taped it) and he gave them the letters that he sent home and vise versa and they are now part of the archives. Also, Congress passed a resolution to record the personal histories of as many vets of 20th century conflicts as possible. It's the responsibility of each state's senators to see that it's done so method's vary state to state. In Indiana we are lucky in that Senator Lugar has taken it very seriously. A college student who was about to enter the military was the volunteer who came out and recorded Dad's story and photos now and then with him. ALL of the histories are to be entered into the Library of Congress. I would urge all of you to contact your Senator's office to help insure that your stories survive.

Heidi Girman (daughter of Gene Girman)

PS: Dad is at Lakeside VA in Chicago for at least the next week or so learning to use his new leg. With his various medical problems it hasn't been easy but he's a trooper and working very hard.
--part1_3c.22ab50b9.2a8d6add_boundary-- From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Fri Aug 16 00:38:39 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (Brian D. O'Neill) Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 19:38:39 -0400 Subject: [303rd-Talk] RE: 303rd-Talk digest, Vol 1 #670 - 7 msgs In-Reply-To: <20020815160110.C593253668@pairlist.net> Message-ID: Well, I have to weigh in on Mary Jo Hangartner's questions about the modern "Memphis Belle" movie, other B-17 movies and "the way it was" generally. Based on the research I did for "Half a Wing," focusing on Bob Hullar's crew in mid 1943 early 1944, there is NOTHING about the modern Memphis Belle movie that is remotely accurate, either factually or as a reflection of the mentality of B-17 crewmen in the Big One. In fact, I read somewhere that the producers weren't even trying to reflect the spirit of the time in their characters, because it wouldn't be "relevant" to a modern youthful audience. Instead, they were looking for "Top Gun" Tom Cruise type thrills and chills in period costume!! Merlin Miller, the Hullar Crew's tail gunner, confirmed this to me when he said the movie's characters seemed to him like modern kids too. It's amazing that all that time and money was wasted on an effort that didn't even TRY to be accurate. The film is so bad it should never have been released. It's been ages since I've seen "The War Lover." The McQueen character was a jackass, but at least the movie tried to tell the story of a single crew while seeking, with much less success, to ask some "what's it all about" questions about why people fight wars. Some of The War Lover's special effects were cheesy, but modern Memphis Belle's special effects are equally "fake" looking. If you can find it, try John Hersey's book The War Lover, which is better than the movie. I always thought of "Command Decision" as just a Clark Gable vehicle, and it never really did much for me. A bit too antiseptic. Who cares how tough "Tooey" Spaatz and his ilk had it. Twelve O'Clock High remains the best B-17 movie, if only because of the Dear Jagger character and that unforgettable beginning, and I do think it's a pretty fair study of combat leadership. But it remains unsatisfying because so little of it takes place in the air. In short, 57 years after it ended, there still isn't a definitive movie about the 8AF war, and I doubt there ever will be. The only thing I think would do the subject justice would be in a mini-series like the HBO "Band of Brothers" production, and I'm not holding my breath. Too bad. Brian O'Neill -----Original Message----- From: 303rd-Talk-admin@303rdBGA.com [mailto:303rd-Talk-admin@303rdBGA.com]On Behalf Of 303rd-Talk-request@303rdBGA.com Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 12:01 PM To: 303rd-Talk@303rdBGA.com Subject: 303rd-Talk digest, Vol 1 #670 - 7 msgs Send 303rd-Talk mailing list submissions to 303rd-Talk@303rdBGA.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/303rd-Talk or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to 303rd-Talk-request@303rdBGA.com You can reach the person managing the list at 303rd-Talk-admin@303rdBGA.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of 303rd-Talk digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: RE: Wyler film footage (Kevin Pearson) 2. New member (Jack Parker) 3. Re: New member (IBSPEC@aol.com) 4. Re: Memphis Belle and Phony Phortresses (Brian McGuire) 5. RE: Wylers and movies (Mike McClanahan) 6. Re: Memphis Belle and Phony Phortresses (William Heller) 7. Hollywood version of "Memphis Belle" (Mary Jo Hangartner) --__--__-- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:56:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Kevin Pearson Subject: Re: [303rd-Talk] RE: Wyler film footage To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Reply-To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Mike, that is another very facinating fact I did not know. Thanks for contributing. I have also heard Wylder made 20 versions of Memphis Belle before he was finally satisfied with the final version. Cheers Kevin --- Mike McClanahan wrote: > While Kevin is certainly right that the Hollywood > types weren't too > fussy about cutting scenes and aircraft out of > context into their > "documentaries," let me insert a comment to the > discussion, if I may. > > Don't know how many times I've watched Wm. Wyler's > "Memphis Belle," but > it's a bunch (I could only stand to watch his > daughter Susan's version > twice without yelling back at the screen). And > every time I saw it, I > smugly said to myself "Look at those QE's and XM's. > They're not even > from the 91st !" > > True enough, but had I dug a little deeper, I would > have learned that QE > & XM are from the 331st and 332nd Squads of the 94th > and that in May of > '43, the 94th was sharing bases with the 91st at > Bassingbourn and the > 306th at Thurleigh while they waited for their own > base at Rougham to be > ready for them. So the footage showing them taking > off with the Belle > is accurate! > > When you have gasbags like Andy Rooney and > plagiarists like some > "authorities" who have worked their way into > positions of honor at our > most sacred museums, it's easy (and often accurate) > to tar and feather > the PR flacks working for Hollywood and the War > Department during the > war. But sometimes there are actually little gems > of trivia to be > learned from what seem to be errors. > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs http://www.hotjobs.com --__--__-- Message: 2 From: "Jack Parker" To: <303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com> Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:07:32 -0500 Subject: [303rd-Talk] New member Reply-To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C24382.C96E1740 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This is to inform all members that my dad, Jack Parker is now on the = chat line. He's new to computers so it may take a while for him to = respond.My name is J.D. Parker and my address is j.d.parker@juno.com. = Dad was in the 359th from May to Nov. '44. He was Co-pilot with William = Morgan's group until he got his own plane. His picture is on your site = and he was the pilot of the Bonnie B when it received the damage shown = in the picture. Dad's health is failing ( He's 80 ) but we will try to = get him to share as much of his experiences as possible. Thanks! ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C24382.C96E1740 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This is to inform all members that my = dad, Jack=20 Parker is now on the chat line. He's new to computers so it may take a = while for=20 him to respond.My name is J.D. Parker and my address is j.d.parker@juno.com. Dad was in = the 359th=20 from May to Nov. '44. He was Co-pilot with William Morgan's group until = he got=20 his own plane. His picture is on your site and he was the pilot of the = Bonnie B=20 when it received the damage shown in the picture. Dad's health is = failing ( He's=20 80 ) but we will try to get him to share as much of his experiences as = possible.=20 Thanks!
------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C24382.C96E1740-- --__--__-- Message: 3 From: IBSPEC@aol.com Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 19:32:56 EDT Subject: Re: [303rd-Talk] New member To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Reply-To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com welcome jack parker . jump in tell us all about it --__--__-- Message: 4 From: "Brian McGuire" To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Subject: Re: [303rd-Talk] Memphis Belle and Phony Phortresses Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 21:17:31 -0500 Reply-To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com

One thing that ruined the film for me was the bailout scene, where they use a model and toy parachute and it looked so fake you couldn't help but to laugh. Even the end scene where McQueen meets the cliffs of Dover looked so fake you had to wonder how low their budget was. Would be interested in what others may think of the rest of the movie.

Brian S. McGuire

>From: Bob Hand
>Reply-To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com
>To: <303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com>
>Subject: Re: [303rd-Talk] Memphis Belle and Phony Phortresses
>Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:39:00 -0400
>
>I must dig up "War Lover" from my philes and again watch the antics of
>McQueen as he infiltrates the relationship between Bob Wagner and his
>sweetie...there was one of these characters on every base. He cuts in on the
>dance floor and off goes the date you've spent all evening wining and
>dining. (She calls you the next day and explains, "I just couldn't help
>myself!"....yeah, sure.) Sound familiar? Cheers, Bob Hand
>
>


MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: Click Here
--__--__-- Message: 5 From: "Mike McClanahan" To: <303rd-Talk@303rdBGA.com> Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 23:28:56 -0600 Subject: [303rd-Talk] RE: Wylers and movies Reply-To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com For some reason I keep referring to Wm Wyler's daughter as Susan, when her name is Catherine, as Kevin correctly stated in his message. Must be some sort of Phreudian thing. Re the '43 Memphis Belle and The War Lover, I was able to check both out from the Denver Public Library with my library card (saved a few bucks). I'm gonna try Combat America and Command Decision next time I'm there. Sometimes larger libraries are a good source for hard-to-find movies. Mike McClanahan --__--__-- Message: 6 Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 01:20:59 -0700 From: William Heller To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Subject: Re: [303rd-Talk] Memphis Belle and Phony Phortresses Reply-To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com --------------60E1DCC90517B313AD5A28FC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The movie was a total joke, Brian. A vehicle for McQueen who had not just made it yet. And, an opportunity to use some of the "morgue" shots that those Motion Picture Units had after working at our Air Bases. Some say 12 O'clock High was about as original as you can get. Especially the Dean Jagger scene at the beginning and end. I agree with that. But for me, BEING there was as actual as you can get and yet, today, there are those who just do not want to hear us tell it like it was .... The other day a local young lady saw my 8th AF Bolo Tie and asked me what it represented. When I told her it was from the famous 8th AF of WW#2, she asked me WHEN was WW#2! As I began to tell her, I stopped and asked, "What do you do for a living?" She said she was an elementary school teacher! It is to be sad. Cheers! Brian McGuire wrote: > > > One thing that ruined the film for me was the bailout > scene, where they use a model and toy parachute and it > looked so fake you couldn't help but to laugh. Even the > end scene where McQueen meets the cliffs of Dover looked > so fake you had to wonder how low their budget was. Would > be interested in what others may think of the rest of the > movie. > > Brian S. McGuire>From: Bob Hand > >Reply-To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com > >To: <303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com> > >Subject: Re: [303rd-Talk] Memphis Belle and Phony > Phortresses > >Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:39:00 -0400 > > > >I must dig up "War Lover" from my philes and again watch > the antics of > >McQueen as he infiltrates the relationship between Bob > Wagner and his > >sweetie...there was one of these characters on every > base. He cuts in on the > >dance floor and off goes the date you've spent all > evening wining and > >dining. (She calls you the next day and explains, "I just > couldn't help > >myself!"....yeah, sure.) Sound familiar? Cheers, Bob Hand > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your > photos: Click Here --------------60E1DCC90517B313AD5A28FC Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The movie was a total joke, Brian. A vehicle for McQueen who had not just made it yet. And, an opportunity to use some of the "morgue" shots that those Motion Picture Units had after working at our Air Bases.  Some say 12 O'clock High was about as original as you can get. Especially the Dean Jagger scene at the beginning and end.  I agree with that. But for me, BEING there was as actual as you can get and yet, today, there are those who just do not want to hear us tell it like it was ....  The other day a local young lady saw my 8th AF Bolo Tie and asked me what it represented. When I told her it was from the famous 8th AF of WW#2, she asked me WHEN was WW#2!   As I began to tell her, I stopped and asked, "What do you do for a living?"  She said she was an elementary school teacher! It is to be sad.

Cheers!
 
 

Brian McGuire wrote:

 

One thing that ruined the film for me was the bailout scene, where they use a model and toy parachute and it looked so fake you couldn't help but to laugh. Even the end scene where McQueen meets the cliffs of Dover looked so fake you had to wonder how low their budget was. Would be interested in what others may think of the rest of the movie.

Brian S. McGuire>From: Bob Hand 
>Reply-To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com
>To: <303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com>
>Subject: Re: [303rd-Talk] Memphis Belle and Phony Phortresses
>Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:39:00 -0400
>
>I must dig up "War Lover" from my philes and again watch the antics of
>McQueen as he infiltrates the relationship between Bob Wagner and his
>sweetie...there was one of these characters on every base. He cuts in on the
>dance floor and off goes the date you've spent all evening wining and
>dining. (She calls you the next day and explains, "I just couldn't help
>myself!"....yeah, sure.) Sound familiar? Cheers, Bob Hand
>
>



MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: Click Here
--------------60E1DCC90517B313AD5A28FC-- --__--__-- Message: 7 Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 09:13:52 +0000 From: "Mary Jo Hangartner" To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Subject: [303rd-Talk] Hollywood version of "Memphis Belle" Reply-To: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com I am the daughter of a member of the 8th Air Force (James M. Pierce), who had to bail out of his B-17 on his 11th mission, and who was at Molesworth from May 27, 1944 to October 6, 1944. I am also an 8th grade Language Arts teacher who teaches an extensive WWII literature unit. I would just like to say that it was not until the Hollywood version of the movie that my dad even began to talk about his war experiences, and he still is quite guarded about what he will share with his family. I have often asked him if he would speak to my students, and he refuses, partly because that just is not his style, and partly because of the questions that the 8th grade boys will ask. I use the Hollywood version of "Memphis Belle" in my classroom after we have also read the play "The Diary of Anne Frank." Then we have a boy's and a girl's perspective, two different countries and two very different situations, but both of young people and how they were affected by WWII. I also have available "Suicide Missions, Ball Turret Gunners" which I bought for Dad as he does not have cable to watch it. Am I giving my students a terribly inaccurate picture by using these Hollywood versions of movies? My thoughts are that at least I am getting them interested and asking questions about that point in history. Dad has also pointed out many things about the Hollywood "Memphis Belle" which were not accurate at all. In the end, my students are asked to find someone else's story, someone who was also between the ages of 10 and 25 during the war, anywhere in the world, and then they write and tell the class the story that they have found. They can use true accounts in books, interview someone in person, or correspond with someone via email. I will retell them my dad's story, as best I know it, as an example. Every year there are a handful of students, mostly boys, who comment that this is "the best" thing that we have done in this class. Others have commented that my class is more like Social Studies than Language Arts ; I also consider that a compliment as I tend to enjoy true stories even more than the fictional ones. Just wanted to let you know that I am doing my best to generate interest in what these men did out of appreciation to all of you and Dad, but at the same time hope that I am not over-glamorizing war. The kids have brought in some interesting speakers on their own, as well as audio and videotapes to accompany their written stories. --__--__-- _______________________________________________ 303rd-Talk mailing list 303rd-Talk@303rdBGA.com http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/303rd-Talk End of 303rd-Talk Digest From 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com Fri Aug 16 00:52:10 2002 From: 303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com (303rd-talk@303rdBGA.com) Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 19:52:10 EDT Subject: [303rd-Talk] Hollywood version of "Memphis Belle" Message-ID: <83.1f33a0e6.2a8d98aa@aol.com> Mary Jo, If you are serious about wantin